TMP editor, Chuka Umunna, looks at the accusation that certain of Labour’s deputy leadership contenders are “lurching to the left”.
Many, myself included, feared the Labour deputy leadership election would be nothing more than a personality contest. Whatever Roy Hattersley and others may have said about the post, the contest to become deputy leader has been anything but a beauty parade. It has turned into a genuine policy and values debate about Labour’s future, as Polly Toynbee rightly points out.
Some of the contenders have shown they have the courage to say things many Labour people only dared whisper during the height of Blairism. Peter Hain, Harriet Harman and Jon Cruddas have all wondered aloud how we can make our society more equal than it has been over the last 10 years. They do not believe this is as good as it gets and they think Labour can do better.
So Hain has called for action to be taken in relation to City bonuses and this week suggested that those selling property should pay stamp duty to help first time buyers. Harman has called for a Royal commission on the distribution of income and wealth. Leading the charge is Cruddas, the backbencher who has come out of nowhere to become a front-runner. Having put housing issues firmly on the map, this week he said he was not hostile to a 50% top rate of tax for the very, very rich.
But this has sparked accusations of a “lurch to the left” and a drift back to the past by Labour’s very own “no turning back” brigade. John Hutton is just the latest member of this awkward squad, who has warned against getting sucked into an argument about regulating the incomes of wealthy people or tackling the gap between the very rich and the very poor, for fear loosing the better off’s votes (Tory George Osborne has made the same accusations for different reasons). But the “no lurcher” brigade’s claims simply do not add up.
In the 90s, Labour was obsessed with “Worcester woman”, “Sierra man” and all the “pebble dash” people. No one is suggesting Labour dumps the support of these people, many of whose votes the party won for the first time in 1997. Paradoxically, these new Labour voters have stayed loyal, so it is not their votes the “no lurchers” should be worrying about; it is the 5 million voters - public sector workers, manual workers, black and minority ethnic people and urban intellectuals - who have left in droves since 1997, that should concern them. Never mind the women’s vote Toynbee referred to, if these groups’ support (men and women) continues to wane, Labour will loose the next general election.
Read the rest of this entry »