An end to Mugabe’s madness?

28 03 2008

Zimbabwe’s general election takes place tomorrow against a backdrop of a long-running and worsening economic crisis, political uncertainty and the likelihood of increasing political and criminal violence.

Observers will be watching keenly to see whether finally, after years of misrule, the Movement for Democratic Change’s Morgan Tsvangirai or former government minister Simba Makoni can topple President Robert Mugabe and, if so, whether the country’s secrutiy forces will abide by the electorate’s decision.

Ahead of this tumultuous day, Dr Knox Chitiyo, head of the Africa Programme at the Royal United Services Institute, has written an overview of the political situation in Zimbabwe for Chatham House which can be read here.



Migrants say discrimination undermines their sense of belonging in Britain

28 03 2008

A report published last week found that nearly half of minority ethnic residents, including Muslims, said they had experienced race discrimination and 30 per cent of recent Muslim migrants had experienced religious discrimination. This was cited as a key barrier to a sense of belonging in Britain.

The report – Immigration, faith and cohesion – published by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, was written by a team at the Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS) at Oxford University. It looked at what factors contribute to, or undermine, community cohesion in three urban areas in England with large migrant and Muslim populations.

Most migrants felt there was no conflict in having a sense of belonging to both Britain and their country of origin. Sixty per cent of long-term Muslim residents born outside the UK said the people most important to them were in Britain.

Co-author Hiranthi Jayaweera from COMPAS (right) said: ‘Evidence suggests that it is discrimination and the perception of being unwelcome, rather than attachment to their country of origin, that reduces migrants’ sense of belonging in Britain.’

Ninety-nine per cent of recent Muslim migrants strongly emphasised democracy, justice and security as the top reasons for living in Britain. Researchers also found that Muslims and non-Muslims shared a common concern about the problems of crime, drugs and pollution in the areas where they lived.

Read the rest of this entry »



Obama’s perfect speech

22 03 2008

Resident columnist Lola Adesioye reflects on Barack Obama’s speech on race this week.

untitled-truecolor-03.jpg

Regardless of whether or not people think Barack Obama is capable of being the next president of America, he has shown himself this week to be one of the greatest post-civil rights thinkers of this generation. Many people – both black and white - now feel that the polarized, divided, white-versus-black rhetoric of leaders from the civil rights era is outdated, yet no senior politician or public figure has been able to offer a new cohesive vision or understanding of modern day American race relations.

The Civil Rights movement was an extremely important part of American history. The vocal, often angry, finger-pointing, in-your-face nature of civil rights leaders was necessary and appropriate for the time. That energy was needed in order for crucial changes to take place. Today though, as the media storm about Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s comments have shown, that kind of presentation of America’s racial problems is seen as divisive and turns people off. Those who have not been brought up watching a fight for basic rights simply do not understand black people who talk about race in that way.

Post Civil Rights, America appears to have struggled somewhat in an effort to find a newer political and social vision that incorporates the racial challenges of today, resulting in less than honest or open discussions about the topic. For example, it’s only recently that people believe that the issue of race has become a core issue in the American electoral campaign yet it has been discussed, albeit indirectly, almost daily. Barack Obama went a long way towards directly addressing the issue that this week with his brilliant “Perfect Union” speech.

Few find it easy to discuss race in a way which is not divisive or inflammatory. Obama’s speech showed that race can be discussed and presented in a way that takes in the concerns of all people of all colours and addresses them in a progressive manner, whilst also taking history and its present-day ramifications into account. He does not discount the anger felt by some sections of the black community, nor the anger felt by some white people. He recognizes that all viewpoints are legitimate. The question that he addresses – the most fundamental question – is how to move forward from that.

Moving forward requires looking at the real issues, rather than simply putting problems down to racism or racial differences. The young men standing on the corner selling drugs are not there because they are black. They are there because, as Obama says, many of “…the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.” Despite that recognition, however, Obama still calls on the black community to be responsible and take positive action in spite of difficulties.

Obama was right to say that the comments made by both Geraldine Farraro and his own pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright are expressions of the complexities surrounding race. Indeed race is a complex issue, which until now seemingly had no unifying path. Blacks and whites in America have come closer together, but in many ways still remain so distant and still view each other with some suspicion. Obama, however, points out that the unifying factor is that ultimately all Americans want the same thing: a better future. As he says: “…we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes;…we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for our children and our grandchildren.” It’s so simple but yet has been so hard to reach and so hard to articulate.

I was thoroughly impressed by Obama’s speech. Anyone who has questioned Obama’s ability to understand the challenges facing African Americans should no longer be in doubt that this is a man with a very deep and thorough understanding – and forward thinking vision – of race in America today. He clearly also understands how race affects and impacts on white people which is vital because difficult race relations is a problem for all of America, not just some sections of it.

Obama’s speech is not only relevant to America. All western countries can benefit from Obama’s vision and I hope our own UK government will read his words and reflect.



The Obama campaign - a cult of personality?

13 03 2008

obama-fans.jpgMany commentators have taken a dim view of supporters of Senator Barack Obama’s campaign to win the U.S Democratic Party’s presidential nomination. 

Here is the New Stateman’s Andrew Stephen bemoaning the media’s treatment of Barack Obama in January:
“Obama’s relationship with the press and the electorate is still at the stage of starry-eyed infatuation. Yes, he is a mesmerising political orator who offers a magic elixir that somehow contains both stimulants and sedatives: that we need not worry about the present or future, because we can look forward to a new dawn of hope and reassurance in the safe hands of President Obama. Exactly how and why this would happen is not clear, but it is heady and exciting stuff.”

Pondering why the Democratic nomination race has become so fractious, the New York Times’ Paul Krugman said shortly after Super Tuesday back in February, in a piece entitled “Hate Springs Eternal”:
“I won’t try for fake evenhandedness here: most of the venom I see is coming from supporters of Mr. Obama, who want their hero or nobody. I’m not the first to point out that the Obama campaign seems dangerously close to becoming a cult of personality.”

So readers of TMP may be amused to watch this video clip of an Obama supporter being interviewed by a reporter who appears to presume the said supporter has no knowledge of Obama’s policy positions or how they differ from the other Democratic candidates, but is simply a fan of the Democratic candidate’s personality. The reporter finds it turns out to be quite the opposite with this Obama fan.



The Clinton campaign and race

13 03 2008

Yesterday, former U.S. Democratic Vice Presidential candidate, Gerldine Ferraro, was force to step down from her position as a member of Senator Hillary Clinton’s campaign finance committee after she said that Senator Barack Obama, Clinton’s main adversary, would not be in the position he is in the Democratic presidential nomination race were he not an African American man.

On 7 March 2007, in an interview with a small local newspaper in Califiornia, the Democrat’s 1984 Vice Presidential nominee said,

“I think what America feels about a woman becoming president takes a very secondary place to Obama’s campaign - to a kind of campaign that it would be hard for anyone to run against.
“For one thing, you have the press, which has been uniquely hard on [Senator Clinton]. It’s been a very sexist media. Some just don’t like her. The others have gotten caught up in the Obama campaign.
“If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position,” she continued. “And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”

Clinton has already sought to distance herself from Ferrero’s remarks by saying she “rejects” them but it took more than four days for Ferrero to voluntarily resign from Clinton’s campaign team. Obama has said he thinks the remarks are “absurd”.  In light of the Ferraro row, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann, one of that U.S. news channel’s best known news anchors and commentators, has launched a stinging attack on Ferraro and the Clinton campaign’s use of the “race” issue which can be viewed below.



Roll on Pennsylvania as Obama continues to lead McCain

12 03 2008

Senator Barack Obama, who - as expected - stormed to victory in the Mississippi primary last night, remains ahead of fellow Senator Hillary Clinton not only in the delegate count in the race to win the U.S Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, but also in polls pitting the two against the Republican nominee, Senator John McCain.

Obama won 61% of the vote in Mississipi and now has 1600 delegates to Clinton’s 1484. So far, he has won more of the popular vote to date than his rival - 13,855,890 votes to Clinton’s 13,754,871. This has led Obama to rubbish suggestions coming from the Clinton camp that he could run as Clinton’s Vice Presidential running mate, below.

Obama also continues to perform more favourably against Republican nominee, Senator John McCain, than Clinton. In the latest RealClearPolitics poll of polls, Obama leads McCain by 5.2 points whilst Clinton only leads McCain by 1.7 points. Obama has consistently outpolled McCain in recent months.

The next key test for both candidates will be in Pennsylvania on 22 April where 188 delegates are up for grabs.



We Don’t Care About The Proms

7 03 2008

Resident columnist Lola Adesioye reflects on this week’s comments on the Proms by Culture Minister, Margaret Hodge MP. 

untitled-truecolor-03.jpgCulture Minister Margaret Hodge’s criticism of the Proms this week shows just how out of touch and over zealous the PC brigade has become when it comes to issues of diversity and minority inclusion. Don’t get me wrong, diversity and inclusion are important – when it comes to things that actually matter such as inequality in the workplace, the legal system, socio-economics and education. Of all the issues facing minorities, ethnic representation at the Proms comes very low on the list – if anyone really cares about it at all.

Hodge’s criticisms about the lack of diversity at the BBC Proms are misplaced. It is a wasted effort for her to criticize harmless aspects of British culture, such as the Proms, when there are other elements of the culture - representation of minorities in the media for example - which have been, and still are, in need of fixing and are of much more relevance.

I have yet to go to the Proms but I make an effort to watch it on television every year. I’ve always wanted to attend for the very reasons that Margaret Hodges offers criticism – partly because it is a particularly British phenomenon. Not only is there a fantastic selection of classical music, but it is also interesting to experience something different.

It is important that people of all backgrounds are able to participate in the arts in general. That issue has been and is being addressed by initiatives such as free entrance to museums and the £10 Travelex season at the National Theatre. The arts fall under a broad umbrella and not everything will appeal to all people. Nor should they. The arts should be diverse – not only in terms of participants, but in the types of creative expression that are encompassed. This politically correct insistence on homogeneity in all aspects of modern life is troubling.

Read the rest of this entry »