We Don’t Care About The Proms

7 03 2008

Resident columnist Lola Adesioye reflects on this week’s comments on the Proms by Culture Minister, Margaret Hodge MP. 

untitled-truecolor-03.jpgCulture Minister Margaret Hodge’s criticism of the Proms this week shows just how out of touch and over zealous the PC brigade has become when it comes to issues of diversity and minority inclusion. Don’t get me wrong, diversity and inclusion are important – when it comes to things that actually matter such as inequality in the workplace, the legal system, socio-economics and education. Of all the issues facing minorities, ethnic representation at the Proms comes very low on the list – if anyone really cares about it at all.

Hodge’s criticisms about the lack of diversity at the BBC Proms are misplaced. It is a wasted effort for her to criticize harmless aspects of British culture, such as the Proms, when there are other elements of the culture - representation of minorities in the media for example - which have been, and still are, in need of fixing and are of much more relevance.

I have yet to go to the Proms but I make an effort to watch it on television every year. I’ve always wanted to attend for the very reasons that Margaret Hodges offers criticism – partly because it is a particularly British phenomenon. Not only is there a fantastic selection of classical music, but it is also interesting to experience something different.

It is important that people of all backgrounds are able to participate in the arts in general. That issue has been and is being addressed by initiatives such as free entrance to museums and the £10 Travelex season at the National Theatre. The arts fall under a broad umbrella and not everything will appeal to all people. Nor should they. The arts should be diverse – not only in terms of participants, but in the types of creative expression that are encompassed. This politically correct insistence on homogeneity in all aspects of modern life is troubling.

A certain demographic and type of person tends to consume and listen to classical music, and the same goes for Hip Hop, Indie and other forms of music. Some things will necessarily be unrepresentative in terms of the ethnic or social composition of the audience. This is not problematic so long as others have the option as to whether or not to participate, and they do currently have that choice. What next, quotas on the number of ethnic minority participation at the Proms?

It’s also patronizing to suggest that in order for something to be inclusive to others it must somehow incorporate things that minority groups know, or are familiar with. A classic politically correct attitude is that in order for classical music, for example, to be relevant to black people, it must include Hip Hop, or to be relevant to India must include Bhangra. In any case, Hodge’s comments are not accurate. The Proms has embraced jazz and world music, and last year featured music from the likes of contemporary Indian artist Nitin Sawney and the Soweto String Ensemble.

There appears to be a growing anti-multiculturalism sentiment taking place at the moment, and a public sense that the promotion of diversity is somehow eroding British culture. This type of comment fuels that sentiment. It’s a shame because representation at the Proms is not something that I believe minorities are particularly calling for.

The audience at the Proms may be ‘unrepresentative’ of the general population, but I don’t believe that many people feel that they can’t go or they wouldn’t feel “at ease” there, rather than they just don’t care to go! It’s not as if the Proms is full of shaven headed, bovver-booted BNP supporters. Margaret Hodge seems to be talking on behalf of people who, quite frankly, have better things to worry about. She’s better off talking about cultural issues that are of more importance.

Lola Adesioye is a freelance writer who specializes in commenting on socio-political and cultural issues affecting the black community.


Actions

Informations

3 responses to “We Don’t Care About The Proms”

8 03 2008
COLTRANE (02:52:43) :

Lola,
interesting…but one point that your piece seems to be missing is the question of whether or not the Proms is in receipt of public money. Presumably it is, indirectly, through the contribution of the BBC.

If so, I think Mrs Hodge is entitled to question whether public money is being spent in line with the Government’s vision of ‘culture’. Personally i am not a fan of people who wave flags, people who wear them, people who salute them, people who have flagpoles in their garden, people who burn them and politicians who even refer to it in passing.

On a flips side this is David Cameron’s response:

“I think Margaret Hodge is wrong. I think we want more things where people come together to celebrate Britishness and more occasions when people think the Union Jack is a great symbol of our Britishness, rather than sniping at it,”

Now Lola, tell us if you agree with this statement.

20 03 2008
Lola (21:37:44) :

HI Coltrane

You have asked some interesting questions. It’s great that the government has a vision of how culture should look or what it should embody. But I do not like the notion that an event’s cultural significance or worth is determined by the racial makeup of its audience. To me that is political correctness gone overboard. My concern is that events should not be exclusive or prohibitive and that everybody should be able to attend. If people choose not to attend, however, that’s another matter. Maybe in this case it’s a question of making classical music in general more accessible or better understood so that people want to go to the Proms. Maybe it’s about better promotion of the event to ethnic minorities.

I think we also need to see things in context. If you have watched or attended the Proms you will see that flag waving actually occurs on one night - the last night. It would trouble me if the waving of the flag was accompanied by racist chanting, but it isn’t. The Last Night at the Proms is a pretty celebratory and high spirited event. I am not particularly comfortable with the Union Jack because in my mind there are a lot of negative connotations carried with it. However, I’m sure there are (non-racist) English people who feel proud to carry it and I personally feel they should have the right to do so, so long as it’s not done in a manner of exclusion or in an environment in which it is intended to be a symbol of division or negativity.

Do I agree with David Cameron’s comments? Well, as I’ve said above, I’m unlikely to be one of those walking around with the Union Jack in hand. The flag does carry connotations of racism and imperialism with it in my mind. I like you am not a big fan of flag waving, flag references and so on. But it does matter to some people, whether or not I like it. Do I agree with Cameron that it would be good for the flag to be a positive symbol of Britishness? Yes. That would entail a great deal of PR work in order to change the perception of the flag.

27 03 2008
COLTRANE (04:12:32) :

Lola,

thanks for your comment even though I beg to disagree with DC and his flag waving crusade.

I wonder what sort of PR that would entail but in my opinion Government isn’t doing enough with this thing they call “integration” whatever that means

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>